(color) & (color)

February 4, 2011

Black and Yellow
So, I’ve been enjoying the song Black & Yellow by Wiz Khalifa for a bit now. I can’t say I was early on the listening curve though. Maybe I had heard it a couple weeks before Girl Talk sampled it on All Day but probably only a couple weeks before. Shortly after I began enjoying the song, the NFL playoffs started and I started seeing people associate the song with the Pittsburg Steelers. The #blackandyellow hashtag was a popular one for Steelers fans on Twitter. Black and Yellow played a lot during their games. Was their an official connection?

I searched the Googles. I found the Wikipedia article for the song. Sure enough, Wiz is from Pittsburg and the song is about the city and their sports teams (Steelers, Pirates, Penguins… all Black and Yellow). So, pretty much for this reason alone, I’ve rooted for the Steelers in every NFL game. (Since my Rams didn’t make the playoffs, I have no real interest in the games, so I pick who I’m pulling for in a rather arbitrary basis). Along the same lines, I was planning on cheering for the Steelers against the Packers.

Then this morning, my favorite rapper Lil Wayne released a Green Bay version of this song, Green and Yellow. I was happy to hear some new Weezy, but kind of annoyed that people were taking a song that was written basically about the Steelers and making it a Packers song. Get your own damn song.

But none the less, it piqued my curiosity. I knew there were a lot of different versions of this song, but how many? Wikipedia lists 49. FORTY NINE. Ironically, not one of them is about The San Francisco 49ers. I could only find 40 of them anywhere on line, and I downloaded all of them (or ripped the audio from their YouTube videos). I put them in one zip file for you to evaluate the varying degrees of quality.

I downloaded theses in rapid succession and listened to hardly any of them in their entirety, but here are some highlights that I noticed:

  • There are a couple about high schools (Green & White by Larceny and Green & Yellow by YoFitteds). These are both hilariously bad.
  • Northwestern has TWO VERSIONS (White and Purple). One by some dude who did it first, and another by Chet Haze, who is apparently Tom Hanks son and ripped this kid off. This is funny.
  • Black and Gold is the most common variation with 4 different songs. (Saints, Vanderbilt, UFC, and… not sure what the last one is for)
  • Anyway, I’ll shut up and share this file. If you want to share it, please link to this post and not the megaupload link. Thanks.

    (Also, if you are thinking about making a remix of this song for you school, probably don’t do it. I can’t imagine it would be original or interesting at this point.)

    BLACK AND YELLOW 40 PACK. DOWNLOAD HERE.

    You can find the tracklist here (on Wikipedia, as of 2/4/11 at 1:03am Central)

    except here’s the ones I couldn’t find:
    “Young & Ladded” by Swych
    “Black and Scarlet” by Feezio representing Git Bread Ent. of Little Rock, Arkansas
    “Green and Gold” by Killed for Less representing the Oswego Lakers
    “Red and Yellow” by rapper Big Will representing Streetz 104.7 in Winnipeg, Manitoba
    “Black and Silver” by Kazer and 2 Clean representing San Antonio and the San Antonio Spurs
    “Blue and Orange” by K9 representing Syracuse University
    “Green and Purple” by DJ DarkNinja & DaJoka
    “Orange and Silver” by Dj Fish and Young Buck University High School (Orange City)
    “Gua & Pan” by Mohammed Yunus Miah (Mohammed City Remix)Produced By MC MZK (Stansted)


    Tennis: Cape Dory

    February 3, 2011

    Tennis: Cape Dory

    Artist: Tennis
    Album: Cape Dory
    Label: Fat Possum Records
    Release Date: January 18, 2011

    Read the rest of this entry »


    Destroyer: Kaputt

    January 31, 2011

    Destroyer - Kaputt Album Cover

    Artist: Destroyer
    Album: Kaputt
    Label: Merge Records
    Release Date: January 25, 2011

    Read the rest of this entry »


    The Decemberists: The King Is Dead

    January 27, 2011

    So, I’m planning on reviewing a lot of albums on this site. My goal is 50 in 2011. I want to try to do this in some kind of consistent way. With this in mind, I am going to have sections for each review: History, Review, Rating. In the history section, I’ll talk either about the band’s history or my history in the band. The aim of this section is to put my review into perspective by disclosing what I know about the band and how I feel about their earlier work. The review section should be pretty self explanatory. Finally, the rating scale will be a different arbitrary rating (i.e. 4/5 basketballs, NC-17, 12 stars…). Hopefully this will be relevant to the CD. Oh, and I’ll also provide download links. Because I want you to like fun. I also want to keep them pretty short. Here we go. Review 1/50

    The Decemberists - The King is Dead

    The King is Dead, the Decemberists' sixth studio album

    Artist: The Decemberists
    Album: The King Is Dead
    Label: Capitol Records
    Release Date: January 17, 2011

    Read the rest of this entry »


    Girl Talk 1.18.11 The Pageant, St. Louis

    January 25, 2011


    I’ve now seen Girl Talk three times and all three have been a sweaty mess. Twice in a good way. First, an overview of the first two times:

    Read the rest of this entry »


    Building My Hackintosh

    January 17, 2011

    Not to be confused with last week’s “My Hackintosh Build” post which can be found here. That post details the exact hardware, the cost, and compares it against an iMac with similar hardware. This one is about the actual work of building it and getting it running.

    Well, it wasn’t quite as easy as I would have hoped, but I’ve made it. I am typing this post on a brand new Core i5 computer running OS X. Most rewarding of all, I built it myself. Everything major works. Life is good. Some of you may be wondering: How’d you do it? What problems did you encounter? Was it worth it? This post will answer these questions. It will also serve as a bit of a jumping off point if someone is thinking about building one themselves. Hit the break for a detailed description, pictures and more.

    Read the rest of this entry »


    My Hackintosh Build

    January 13, 2011

    So, I’m in the process of building a hackintosh (almost done, fingers crossed). I’ll be posting more about the actual building process, but for now I thought I’d share the parts I used to build it and how much they cost me.

    For reference, here are the specs for a stock 27″ iMac:

  • 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5
  • 4GB 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM – 2x2GB
  • 1TB Serial ATA Drive
  • 8x double-layer SuperDrive
  • ATI Radeon HD 5750 1GB GDDR5 SDRAM
  • I wanted to match or beat that setup as cheaply as possible, so I bought the components from NewEgg over the period of less than a month, only buying things that were discounted.
    Here’s what I ended up with:
    (key: ‘+‘ indicates an improvement over the reference iMac, ‘=‘ indicates it is an equal part. ‘?‘ indicates an item for which Apple does not provide enough detail to make a comparison.)

  • 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5-760 – $179.99 (regularly $204.99)=
  • 6GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM – 3x2GB (CORSAIR XMS3) – $64.99 (regularly: $79.99)+
  • 1TB Serial ATA Drive (WD Caviar Black) – $77.99 (regularly: $87.99)=
  • Sony Optiarc Black $19.99 (regularly: $26.99) ?
  • ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB DDR5 SDRAM (HIS Juniper XT) – $99.99 (regularly $129.99) +
  • Items that Apple doesn’t list specs for, but you need for a computer:

  • GIGABYTE GA-H55-USB3 Motherboard – $99.99 (regularly $109.99)
  • Cooler Master RS750-ACAAE3-US Power Supply – $59.99 (regularly $99.99)
  • Baller unnecessary upgrade:

  • Corsair CSSD-V32GB2-BRKT $59.99 (regularly $78.99)
  • Items I already had and paid nothing for

  • Monitor
  • Mouse
  • Keyboard
  • Computer Case
  • What it cost:
    All in all, these purchases cost me $662.92. Shipping was free on all of them. If nothing was discounted, I would have spent $818.92, meaning I saved $156.00 by doing my shopping over the course of 2.5 weeks (first order was placed 12/21/2010, last order was placed 1/7/11). Compared to the cost of the iMac I was referencing, I saved $1,336.08. That is a lot of money.

    What I got that is better than an iMac is a slightly faster graphics card, 2GB more RAM (not to mention faster ram), a 32gb Solid State Drive that will allow for quicker booting and application launching, and USB 3 support.

    What I didn’t get is a 27″ monitor, a sleek enclosure, or official Apple support. To me, this tradeoff is worth $1,336.08. I could buy a decent monitor and a MacBook Air with that amount of money.

    So, how’d it all come together? I’m still working on it. More posts to come!


    (adj) having or exerting a malignant influence

    January 12, 2011

    Specifically, we are supporting the WebM (VP8) and Theora video codecs, and will consider adding support for other high-quality open codecs in the future. Though H.264 plays an important role in video, as our goal is to enable open innovation, support for the codec will be removed and our resources directed towards completely open codec technologies.

    – The Chromium Blog

    Not Evil

    Google believes in the openness of the internet. They idealistically believe in supporting only 100% unambiguously royalty free video codecs. H.264, while close, does not meet these standards. It is controlled by an advisory board that has made a commitment to have no licensing fees ever, but only for non-commercial use. For Google (and Mozilla, which has already taken a stand against H.264) this isn’t good enough.

    For these reasons, Google will be phasing out support for H.264 in Chrome. This move will accelerate the implementation of the WebM standard and help ensure the longevity of free codec use on the internet. Google will do their part by converting their YouTube videos all to WebM and for the foreseeable future making them capable of running in Flash, H.264 and WebM until WebM achieved parody with H.264 technology in terms of hardware acceleration, stability on mobile devices and battery life performance. Once that happens, Google and their services will stop supporting H.264. We believe that these standards are achievable and will work our hardest with software and hardware companies alike to make this a reality for all users on all platforms.

    Evil

    Google will do almost anything to handicap iOS at this point. It is already on its way to the lion’s share of the smartphone market and it wants to keep it that way. It wants to do to iOS what Windows did to the Mac OS: sub 10% smartphone market share

    What better way to do this than to leverage its three most valuable assets: Chrome, YouTube and Android. They haven’t announced lack of support for H.264 in YouTube or Android yet, but it is only a logical extension to their current rationale for dropping support for the codec on Chrome. Once this happens, browser makers far and wide will start suporting WebM videos. Content producers will do the same. Knowing that older browsers don’t support that format though, Google hopes that they will turn to Flash as their backup. This covers pretty much everyone on the desktop, but who does it leave out on the YouTube fun? iOS users.

    In an effort to marginalize iOS’s market share, Google is willing to announce the removal of support for the most popular video codec in use today. Let’s make this clear. Google is not omitting a popular feature from a future product, as Apple did with Flash. They are removing support of a feature from an existing product. People who use Chrome today have support for H.264. People who use Chrome a year or two from now won’t.

    By the time that Chrome no longer supports H.264, Google hopes (fingers crossed!) that the WebM standard will have gained hardware acceleration support, stability on mobile devices and have a minimal effect on battery life. Then, they can put it on Android phones which will likely have a significantly larger market share than iOS devices by this time. Steve Jobs expressed disdain for WebM in the past and Google hopes that he will be too stubborn to go back on them when (if?) WebM achieves parody with H.264.

    While all of this is happening, Google hopes more developers will go back to Flash. That’s something that everyone who is afraid of Apple can support, right?

    Like all polarizing arguments, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.


    Weezer – Memories Tour

    January 11, 2011

    Part 1 – Weezer and I: It’s Complicated

    Weezer can probably be credited as the first band that gave me a personal interest in finding and discovering music for myself. This may be odd, as the band has always had radio hits. Perhaps they are the first band who I heard on the radio with their hit of the time – Island In The Sun? Hash Pipe? – and thought to myself, “I wonder what else this band has to offer.”

    What did I find? The Blue Album and slightly later, Pinkerton. Two albums that defined the trajectory of my musical interest for years to come. I became a regular reader of Weezer’s web forum first to read about Weezer in the ATW (All Things Weezer) section, but eventually ended up hearing about lots of other bands in the All Bands Not Weezer (ABNW) section. I got into Bright Eyes, Neutral Milk Hotel and tons of other great bands through this forum.

    I also gained a moderate obsession with the band. I downloaded countless rarities, old concert bootlegs, covers and pretty much anything Weezer related I could get my hands on. My strong interest continued despite the release of Maladroit in 2002, which is surely a horrible record. Fortunately, by the time Make Believe came around in 2005, I had moved on to unhealthy interests in other bands.

    From Maladroit to present, Weezer has showered us with 5 albums ranging from slightly above average to horrible. Each album has challenged fans of their first two albums to reevaluate what was so great about the band, and what changed. Has the band changed? Has the age and interests of their old fan base changed? How can a fan base survive 5 disappoints in a row and still be comfortable expressing an appreciation for a band who’s last truly great record was released nearly 15 years ago?

    Read the rest of this entry »


    My Favorite Albums – 2010

    January 8, 2011
    2010 was coming to an end and I tweeted a plea:
    “I need: Your 3-5 favorite new bands of 2010. I have listened to 0, so no answer is too obvious.”

    That was my year. I didn’t do my homework. I listened to the artists I already liked and that was pretty much it. Finally, when December rolled around, I panicked. I got some good responses and spent the next few days dissecting the results. What I found was that I don’t think I missed as much as I was worried about. One act from my desperation push made the list, but for the most part I was content with my results. 2010 was a great year for music, but a bad year for effort on my part.

    Once I had a solid list of 15 or so things I really thought would be alright, ordering them was a different issue. One of my favorite albums of the year was a stand-up comedy CD. Does that deserve a spot in the top 10? I listened to and enjoyed a lot more rap CDs this year, but have a hard time putting them into the context of my appreciation for indie rock. How should this be accounted for?

    Well, I came up with a top 10 and a few honorable mentions. So let’s take a look at how things panned out. As a bonus since there are so many artists on here I have written about in previous years lists,  I’ll be throwing in how I think their 2010 releases compare to some of their other work.

    As always, I’ve provided free download links for all of these albums. Also as always, if you like the album, buy it.

    Hit the break to see ’em.

    Read the rest of this entry »