Dear Facebook, get your stuff together.

June 10, 2011

This post has been a long time coming, is multi-faceted and angry. If anyone who works at Facebook reading this, I would like you to read my whole post, but if you don’t want to do that, read this: I would pay $50/month to have phone/live-chat access to someone who could help me deal with problems similar to the ones I describe below. I’d even pay if you provided timely email support. Submitting a “help” form and waiting 3 weeks for a response is not a viable business proposition.

I work for a company called boom. reactive. Among other things, we help companies out with their Facebook pages. Here are some problems I’ve been having recently.

Section 1: Merging places

An important part of this job is claiming existing unofficial pages and merging them with official pages. This has always been a pain, but for reasons that I understand and to some degree appreciate. Unofficial pages get created (to the best of my knowledge) when someone “checks in” to a location using Facebook on their mobile device, and can’t find the location for some reason, so they create their own. From there, other people check in and all of a sudden, in the case of one of our clients, there were 1,226 check-ins and 277 likes at an unofficial page.

Fortunately, whoever created the page used the company’s phone number in the “information” section. Facebook allows you to verify page ownership by answering the phone and entering a PIN number. “Great,” you might think. “All you have to do is tell your client to answer their phone and send you the PIN number.” Exactly.

So we did. We claimed the place. Then Facebook did what I wanted it to do. It said “Do you want to merge this page with an existing page?”

Yes Facebook! It is like you are reading my mind. That is exactly what I want to do. So I select the page I want to merge it with and get an error that reads approximately this: (in retrospect, I should have taken a screen shot).

“We’re sorry. The locations are too far apart to be eligible to merge. They will remain separate places.” Wonderful. I initially assume that this is my fault and that I had the location of the official page listed incorrectly. I checked:

The two pages that I wanted to merge not only had IDENTICAL street addresses, and their Bing Maps displayed on the Info page are nearly identical as well. I made an overlay here so that we can see how far away these places allegedly are (despite having the same address):

Essentially, well within the margin of GPS error.

So, now I’ve got two separate places. Back in the old days, there used to be a merge places option for admins on the right sidebar, like this:

That’s not there any more. They got rid of it without any warning and merging places is no longer possible. So now I’m stuck with two different places. I could delete one, but then I’d lose over 1,000 check-ins and 270 likes. That’s not good for any business and shouldn’t be necessary.

Section 2: Creating Places

I’m not done with you, Places. There are other headaches that you cause me daily. Another one of our clients who’s page we setup is a food truck. Unlike most food trucks however, they are in the same location every day. This is great for Facebook because it allows them to be a “place” and allows people to check-in there. That means they should be able to offer check-in based deals. All of these things are great!

There’s the nice telling me that if I enter a valid address, users will be able to check-in using Places. The only issue is, that is a valid address, and people can’t check-in there using places. It isn’t possible. Instead of seeing a map when they go to the info page, they just see the street address. Oddly enough, when you click on that street address, it takes you to a map, which certifies that it is a valid address.

This is a problem across the board. We can’t register our own office as a Facebook place for the same reason. It is ridiculous.

There should be a work-around. I should be able to check-in to a place, make an unofficial page and then merge it with the existing page. However as we saw in Section 1, that isn’t possible.

Section 3: Tagging Businesses

Another thing… About a month ago, I read a post regarding the ability for people to tag business pages in Photos. I read it, I got excited about it and I tried it and it worked. Then I encouraged fans of one of our clients to tag the business in pictures so that they’d show up on our wall.

Sure enough, they couldn’t. I had my partner do it. He couldn’t. Some people could tag some businesses, some people could tag no businesses. There seemed to be no rhyme or reason to who could tag what. Why?? And a month later, why is the feature still not rolled out properly? This shouldn’t be a big deal.

Section 4: Where do we go from here?

Despite problems listed above, I believe Facebook is a great way for friends to connect with each other and for businesses to connect with customers in ways that were never possible before. The product has already changed the way people communicate and allows for more people to stay in touch than was ever possible before.

The problems I’ve listed above are clearly more complicated than I understand and I’m sure they’ve been removed or changed or not yet implemented for a reason. What I guess I would like is more communication. A blog post that says “We’ve removed the ‘merge pages’ feature because x y and z. It will be back once we figure out how to work through these problems” or “We’re having Bing integration problems and your new pages might not be showing up as places. Bare with us as we figure this out.”

Instead, if we have questions we get directed to a Help section who’s responses provide mainly vague and common-sense responses. Alternatively, we can browse through the nightmare that is “help discussions” or send off a response that is unlikely to get answered in anything that resembles a timely fashion.

This is a pain in the butt for me, and it is my primary job to work on company’s Facebook pages. I can’t imagine how frustrating it is for shop owners who are managing pages themselves. What I’d imagine happens is that they get frustrated and they quit. They stop using their pages or they never offer deals because things change without warning, the system doesn’t work like it should, and there is no efficient way to get real answers about what’s going on.

Which leads me to my point in the first paragraph. Facebook has real customers and they need real customer service. They want businesses to have pages, but when businesses run into troubles beyond the rudimentary FAQ page, they are left with nowhere to go.

I don’t think it would be unreasonable for Facebook to offer a service where you can speak to a person or chat with them on within a browser. I don’t think it would be unreasonable to charge for it either. I’d pay a lot for it. A small business owner may pay a lot less for it, but it is still something I think a lot of people would be use.

Alternatively, they could offer better explanations about when they add, remove or alter features. Either way, something’s gotta change.

p.s. I really like their facial recognition feature and don’t know why people are so mad about it.

further reading: Ars Technica has had problems with Facebook as well, but on a much larger scale. You can read about it here.


March, a month in review.

March 29, 2011

I’ve tried not to do too many “life-update” type blog posts on this blog thus far, instead focusing on analysis of things that other people are doing, but a lot of stuff happened to me this month, so I’m just gonna roll with it. Everything is divided into sections. There’s still some music stuff here. Just skip over the things you don’t care about. Click through to read the rest!

Read the rest of this entry »


March Madness Quadruple Bracket

March 17, 2011

So, I filled out 4 brackets this year (more on that later). I like having my brackets with me on paper form, but don’t like carrying around 4 sheets of paper. Here’s the solution I came up with:

(click the image to bring up a full-sized version which you can print out. you’ll probably have to click “scale to page”)


The Mountain Goats: All Eternals Deck

March 8, 2011

The Mountain Goats; All Eternals Deck
all eternals deck
Artist The Mountain Goats
Album All Eternals Deck
Label Merge Records
Release Date March 29, 2011

Read the rest of this entry »


Dan Deacon 3.4.11 The Gargoyle, St. Louis

March 6, 2011

Dan Deacon at The Gargoyle
In my last review of the Jan. 18 Girl Talk concert at The Pageant, I commented that the first time I saw Girl Talk, Dan Deacon opened for them and arguably made the show the fantastic experience that it was. Friday, I saw Dan Deacon again, headlining this time. How did he fare? Read on to find out.

Read the rest of this entry »


Preview: The Mountain Goats, All Eternals Deck

March 2, 2011

I’m not ready to review this yet, but this album is streaming on NPR right now and fantastic.

Click here! NPR Music: The Mountain Goats, All Eternals Deck


Bright Eyes: The People’s Key

February 24, 2011

Bright Eyes: The People's Key Album Cover

Artist: Bright Eyes
Album: The People’s Key
Label: Saddle Creek Records
Release Date: February 15, 2011

Read the rest of this entry »


Running OS 7 in OS X (to play Sim Tower)

February 16, 2011

So, I recently found a copy of Sim Tower (CD-ROM) laying around. Nostalgia jackpot. I remembered playing this game on Windows 3.1 & Windows 95 back in the day. Turns out, if you have the disk, you can get everything else for free (and legally, with the exception of 1 Apple license agreement violation, but not where you think.)

But how to play it on my OS X machine? I found out that the Sim Tower CD ROM was made compatible for both Mac and Windows operating systems. Unfortunately, it wasn’t compatible with any of the current ones (or any of the ones that are easy to emulate on OS X). So I was stumped.

First, I tried to use a program called Crossover which allows you to emulate some Windows games on OS X. Couldn’t get it. Then, to my salvation, I found out that it was doable to run an OS 7 emulator. The instructions that I found (the ones I could understand the best) was for a program called Basilisk II: Setting up system 7.5.3 with BasiliskII for Mac OSX

I followed those instructions and everything worked pretty much perfectly. The only thing I did differently was double their recommended amount of RAM from 64 MB to 128 MB. Also, in “preparing your Basilisk folder” Step 4, they say to “google redundant robot sheepsaver” to find the download. I won’t link to the site or the download, as I assume there are reasons that the author of the other post did not do so, but I will verify that it is the first Google result that you want to click on, and I got the Performa ROM and it worked fine.

The instructions are kind of technical, but very well done and pretty easy to follow. So, if you have any classic OS games (1995-1997 era) sitting around, I’d say go for it. Sim Tower is a bit choppy but very usable. I’m having fun and am going to try to find some other games around… looking around already, I just found the original Backyard Football which says it will work on this OS. This should be fun.

Good luck. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Can’t guarantee I’ll be able to help, but we’ll see.


Yo Quiero New Products: Beefy Crunch Burrito

February 10, 2011

Taco Bell, like other fast food locations, has pretty tasty food at very reasonable prices. What I find interesting about it is their ability to crank out new products on a monthly basis, and also advertise them. So throughout the year/as long as I continue this blog, I will do my best to review new Taco Bell products. Reviews will fall under 4 segments: “The Commercial”, “What’s New Here”, “Taste & Volume v. Price” and “My Current Order” I hope that you enjoy this segment 1/4 as much as I enjoy Taco Bell.

Beefy Crunch Burrito

Product: Beefy Crunch Burrito
Release: December 2010
Price: $0.99 (varies by location)

Commercial

Plot: A dude is sitting at a Taco Bell by himself, eating a Beefy Crunch Burrito. He is admiring these two good looking women who are at a different table, and thinking about how they are probably pretty impressed that he is eating something so adventurous. He is playing out a monologue in his head, pointing out the benefits of the burrito and by association, him. When the ladies finally do look over at him, he is predictably embarrassed and awkward. Cut to product voiceover.

Analysis Eh, it’s alright. Stays pretty safely within the bounds of standard Taco Bell commercials, making the assertion that hot girls like guys who eat Taco Bell. Strong message. But, it isn’t very memorable. I had to go back and look up this commercial in order to remember what it was about.

What’s New?

Flamin Hot Fritos

Everything else in this burrito already exists on the menu.

Taste & Volume v. Price

This thing is a steal. It is the Taco Bell trifecta, delicious, filling and cheap. This is the gold standard for which future Taco Bell products should be measured. Granted, I am not a huge eater, but 2 of these is more than enough for a meal. The Flamin Hot Fritos add a unique spice that can’t be found anywhere else on the menu, and also give it almost a crunch wrap supreme mouth feel in burrito form.

The other things in the burrito are pretty much what you’d expect, but I can’t overstate what a great value I think this is. This item will stay in my order as long as it stays on the menu.

My Current Order

(don’t know if this still exists, but this is what I was getting after this product debuted)
$5 Touchdown Box:

  • Crunch Wrap Supreme
  • Beefy Crunch Burrito
  • Regular Taco
  • Cinnamon Twists
  • Drink

  • Iron & Wine: Kiss Each Other Clean

    February 8, 2011

    Iron & Wine Kiss Each Other Clean

    Artist: Iron & Wine
    Album: Kiss Each Other Clean
    Label: Warner
    Release Date: January 25, 2010

    Read the rest of this entry »